On September 25th, I had a little softball "incident" where I got some bad road/gravel rash on my knee. It was worse than a 3rd degree burn in my opinion. It is now October 22nd, and it's finally at the point where I don't need a bandage on it because it's almost healed. Check it out, although the pictures don't really do the injury justice. Lessons learned from this: your knee is a very difficult place to bandage, and Neosporin is a great invention.
Sept. 26th

Oct. 22nd

On to a different topic: you know how Obama is saying he won't tax anyone who doesn't make over $250,000 a year, so it won't be hurting lower and middle-class people? Well, here's a little story to show you how it does. It's called the short story of the annual bonus.
Like 99.9% of engineers, my salary is less than $250,000. However, the corporation I work for most definitely makes more than $250,000 a year. On average, the company I work for probably underpays their engineers a bit, but their argument is that you make it up with your annual bonus, which is based on the performance of the company.
They have a whole formula for calculating the bonus multiplier, and for the last several years the engineering part of the company has been getting the "global" multiplier, which usually happens to be around 1 because some parts of the globe do poorly, some parts of the globe do well, and it averages out. In general, engineering works on global projects with global engineers, etc, so getting the global multiplier sort of makes sense. Other functions in the company get a region specific multiplier, which tends to fluctuate more than the global one. As you can imagine, the North American multiplier hasn't been real hot the last couple of years (< 1). In the good years though, that multiplier has been as high as 1.5 or 2.
Well, conveniently, the corporation is re-evaluating their bonus strategy for the engineering organization, and guess what? Our bonus will now be based on the regional multiplier instead of the global one because each engineer lives in one specific region. From what I've heard from the old-timers, this is the usual standard operating procedure. When North America does well, engineering gets the "global" multiplier (less than NA typically). When North America does poorly, engineering gets the "regional" multiplier. And by the way, corporate says this is NOT a cost saving measure (yeah, right). How does that song go? "She got the mine, I got the shaft..."
Anyway, the point is, when large corporations get taxed, they will pass that tax on - either to their employees (reduced pay, reduced benefits) or their customers (higher prices, reduced quality), sometimes both. The majority of the time, these employees or customers make less than $250,000. I'm not trying to tell you who to vote for, I'm just saying you need to dig deeper on ALL political promises - on the surface they look good, but what about the longer term or hidden consequences?
Disclaimer: In general, the company I work for is a good company. They do still give me benefits and 401K matching, so I try not to complain too much. I just thought this was a perfect illustration of economics 101.
In other work news, last week I had the opportunity to make someone's day, and doesn't that feel good? I've been working with this mechanical drafter on a project, and we were particularly successful in our efforts recently, so I wrote to his boss to tell him what a good job he has been doing. Coincidentally, he was up for promotion review at the end of the week, so my feedback was timely. Sometimes life just works out well. Remember to tell people when they do a good job!
Sorry, this got a little preachy. I'm done now. For reals.