I'm sure most of you are aware of the Edward Snowden thing and how he revealed that the NSA has been spying on all Americans for some time now. Unfortunately, I can't say that totally surprises me, but at the same time it also makes me angry and more paranoid. Here is my general rant on that and other issues related to internet security.
I've always been wary of posting too much personal information on facebook. And I do post a fair amount of personal information on this blog, but in general try to not to make it super obvious what my true identity is. If someone really wanted to, of course they could figure it out by reading seven years of posts. It's not that I have anything to hide, but there are identity thieves out there trolling for information. And not only identity thieves - governments, corporations looking to learn your preferences, etc. Don't be naive. Anything of a personal nature that is on the internet can eventually be read by anyone who is determined to collect that information. Some of it may be harder to get to than others, but eventually they can probably get to all of it unless you're some kind of super encryption wizard who doesn't use any "free" services offered on the internet and makes not purchases over the internet.
When critics of Facebook cite privacy concerns, the founder of Facebook says that he's not concerned about you sharing all the details of your life because you shouldn't be doing things if you need to hide them. It's not a matter to trying to hide stuff. It's a matter of liking privacy and desiring to exercise my right to privacy. It's also about not wanting my identity to be stolen. It's the same thing with the NSA. Supposedly they only collected meta data. Well, you can learn a lot from data. I object to the government wanting to know all that. If I look at your phone records, I could probably tell you who your good friends are, what time of day you like to call your friends and family, who your doctor(s) are, if you and your family are healthy based on the number of times you call your doctor, what types of illnesses you might have based on what type of doctors you're calling, when you've had maintenance issues with your house, issues with your car, etc. The list is nearly as long as your phone bill. Yes, the government can get this information anyway if they get a warrant. But, in my opinion they should have to get a warrant and have probable cause - they shouldn't have carte blanche to collect all data on everybody. To me, that's a lot of power at hand with too much temptation to abuse it, regardless of who is running the government. The only exception to this is if God is the king of your government. There's only one kingdom where that is the case, and none of the countries on the map are that kingdom.
Knowledge is power, and all that knowledge can be used in the wrong way. Most likely it could be misused to blackmail people, to change political candidates and affect voting outcomes by threatening to expose things, to harass someone who disagrees with the status quo, and so many other things. Human nature could think of endless things to do with all that information. And speaking of human nature, let's be realistic. Everyone has done things they don't want everyone else to know about. So there will always be some kind of data to threaten somebody with if the government is allowed to collect it. Unless you're Jesus Christ, but he left this earth more than 2,000 years ago.
To me, all this oversight by the government is feeling a little gestapo-like. Speaking of that, I heard an ad on the radio yesterday for the federal government's website usa.gov. Really!?! That's how they spend my tax money? By advertising their website in an effort to make people even more dependent on the government? The ad included a phase to something of the effect "you'll be surprised how much this website will become your source for information." Ummmm.....no, I won't. Because I don't plan to interact with the federal government that much. I have to renew my passport through that website and pay my taxes to the IRS. And maybe check on travel advisories to other countries. But other than that, I'm not planning to accept more propaganda from the U.S. government by voluntarily visiting their website, thank you very much. I'm sure every time I have to go to their website they collect meta data on me, just like every other website on the internet.
As John Adams, one of our founding fathers stated, "It is more important that innocence should be protected, than it is,
that guilt be punished; for guilt and crimes are so frequent in this
world, that all of them cannot be punished.... when innocence itself, is
brought to the bar and condemned, especially to die, the subject will
exclaim, 'it is immaterial to me whether I behave well or ill, for
virtue itself is no security.' And if such a sentiment as this were to
take hold in the mind of the subject that would be the end of all
security whatsoever." I think I agree with this. If the government is going to be able to prevent all violence in our country, they will be so oppressive that we will lose our freedoms. Take China, for example. Their crime rate is reportedly very low. The amount of freedom they have is also very low. And all that oppression still doesn't prevent all crime. The government is still corrupt, and crimes like human trafficking, fraud, and counterfeiting still occur.
Life doesn't come with a guarantee of complete security, so why is the government trying to make it that way? I vote for freedom with higher risk rather than less freedom with lower risk. We should be reasonable and try to catch terrorists, but let's not lose sight of what is really important.
I was listening to the radio yesterday and today when the reporters were talking about Edward Snowden and how the U.S. government is trying to extradite him because of what he did. To me, this seems over the top. As long as he didn't reveal really deep national secrets, what is the difference between him and every other government employee that leaks information? Every day you can look in the newspaper and read an article related to the government where some government worker is cited giving some inside information, but the source is not named because he/she was speaking on conditions of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss the information. Why are we not rounding up all of those sources of leaks too? To me, this seems like a bit of a witch hunt. If they're going to prosecute him, they should be prosecuting all those other leakers too. Yeah, he shouldn't have broken the confidentiality agreement. But the federal government shouldn't be breaking the trust of all the American people. And if he couldn't in true conscience watch the government continue what he was doing, then good for him to reveal those wrongs. This country was founded by people who objected to the tyranny of government interfering in people's lives.
Ranted out.